Get Permission Sanagala and Raju: Beta initiated advanced closed loop D B S devices in achieving movement in Parkinson`s


Introduction

In Parkinson`s brain the electrophysiological patterns (signatures) alter due to numerous factors, such as age, disease, environmental changes (phenotype) and genetic (change of DNA genes and genome) which is genotype. The subthalamic nucleus (STN) and globus pallidus (DP) are the two major elements to examine in Parkinson`s disease (PD). So, researcher’s aimed at these two neurons with deep brain stimulators and acquiring these neurons signals with microelectrode recording machine. The DBS has been playing a pivotal role since last 2 decade’s and demonstrated a most successful therapeutic surgical procedure largely in patients with advanced idiopathic Parkinson’s disease (PD).1 The advanced adaptive closed loop deep brain stimulator (ACL-DBS) has been established to yield the progress of clinical diagnosis analogous to usual conventional (continuous) omarker loop DBS (COL-DBS) with low-current delivered to brain plus less stimulus induced dyskinesias (related side-effects), postural instability, rigidity, akinesia (Bradykinesia) and tremor, loss of cognition (cognitive impairment CD), cognitive dementia (CD) plus reduced speech articulacy.2, 3

In PD, β activity is considered as a neural biomarker that correlates with the motor impairment, β is however not present in every patient. While PD is a chronic progressive disorder, the most important determinant of clinical progression is advancing age rather than disease duration. Preliminary findings from us show that calendar age is associated with a reduction in β power in the subthalamic nucleus (STN). The following can be suggested: the impacts of disease-process also age over electrophysiological activity, particularly on β activity, involve a biologic interaction.

Augmented synchronization of β-activity within STN steadily seen in people suffering through PD, also concurrent progressively through akinesia (i.e., Bradykinesia) plus stiffness/rigidity. Equally, progress in motoric-akinesia plus stiffness while medication ON and/or DBS ON is clearly linked with inhibition or suppression of β-power. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 Of late, compound findings have highlighted the significance of the temporal (progressive, of time) dynamics of STN-β fluctuations, in which the circumstance of prolonged and sustained β-bursts are absolutely associated with cardinal motoric loss. 10, 11, 12, 13 Collectively these results imply that the STN β activity is a marker (i.e., the bio marker) for Parkinsonian motoric signs which inspired and swayed the progress of β-triggered adaptive closed loop DBS (ACL-DBS) algorithms, objectively advancing the healing efficacy satisfactorily whilst reducing dyskinesias. The outcomes of numerous preliminary testing’s of ACL-DBS through momentarily expressed stimulus electrodes, 8, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 otherwise continually rooted or set in stimulus-devices especially DBS21 direct that β-triggered ACL-DBS, wherein the stimulus intensity (amplitude pulse-width) is attuned built on real-time multi-channel STN β-power approximation, is at best as real as predictable COL-DBS in plummeting motoric-signs inactive and stationary as assessed subjectively falling under the score of 6.

Yet, numerous question-marks persist unreciprocated. Primarily, does β-generated ACL-DBS cause damaging functioning for attaining movements assessed through COL-DBS in Parkinson`s?. There is a STN-β activity reduction biologically and functionally (i.e., physiologically) in controlled movements, which could see in individuals with Parkinson`s disease22, 23, 24 which can also lead to reduction or cessation of stimuli whilst movement in the setup of β-generated ACL-DBS which may conciliate motor functioning associated through COL-DBS if at all more β conquest (clampdown) in movement is obliging and very much supportive to the benefits of therapy maximally whilst subjects challenge movements, i.e., once they want it highly and possibly and perchance.25 Secondarily, is compelling ACL-DBS highly reactive to β-fluctuations by momentarily window-smoothing technique for quantifying the β power result in improving the motor execution well? In order to establish and estimate the β, the window-smoothing is an important parameter which desires to be measured whilst evolving the advanced ACL-DBS device, because diverse ‘windows-smoothing’ change the dynamics of influences amid stimuli plus generated oscillatory-fluctuations. Present research articles β-activated ACL-DBS have projected β power in simultaneous devices (the amount of processing that can be accomplished during interval of time, in the given interval of time) by applying the ‘moving-window- averaging (MWA)’ of 400-ms interval or retentive, meant for β acquisition bursts for elongated intervals largely.10, 14, 15, 16

Earlier researchers26 through the particular trial investigations of local field potentials (LFPs) gathered as of corpus striatum (striate-body) plus motoric and pre motor-cortex in primates exhibited that short-lived(transitory) ruptures-of-oscillatory fluctuations with an interval of 50ms–150ms are accountable for pragmatically all the β frequency band-activity, and which determined modulation’s within the experimentally mean-averaged β stimulus-amplitudes mainly replicate reproduce the intonations (variations) of the ruptures or eruptions (burst) -densities which is consistent with findings of normal controls demonstrating that higher-amplitudes β-events as of somato sensory plus anterior/frontal motor-cortex stereo typically persisted <150ms also had a characteristic stereo typical non sinusoid’s-phase.27 Hence, we hypothesized that there can be spare aids of the advanced ACL-DBS algorithmic-procedure able to pruning STN-β actions and events in to even quicker torrents, as seen in controls sensori motor-cortex cortical basal ganglia (BG) network 26, 27 by the application of rapider window-smoothing algorithmic-technique duration (e.g. 200ms). To respond for all these issues, we built a new procedure merging a signaled achieving errand plus the brain machine interface (MBI) letting concurrent estimation parallelly for the STN-β as well as regulation of stimulus-amplitude (Figure 1) and guessed the motor execution in thirteen Parkinson`s and in four changed stimulus-constraints OFF DBS, COL-DBS, ACL-DBS -400 (ACL-DBS with β stimulus-amplitude smoothed over 400ms), ACL-DBS -200 (ACL-DBS through the β-power smoothed completed in 200 milliseconds).

Materials and Methods

Normal controls

Thirteen subjects with advanced idiopathic Parkinson`s disease male female ratio 7:6 partaken to the experimental-investigation later being employed at our tertiary care hospital in Hyderabad, India (Table 1, clinical demographic). They undertook subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulations bilaterally. Electrodes are summarized in Table 1 were provisionally conveyed preceding to the successive micro neurosurgery to link them to a neuro stimulator. Electrode implanted point of contacts were inveterated deeply-rooted through the blend of pre- op MR imaging and post op CAT scanning’s, that were further inveterated via restructuring the microelectrode paths plus point of varied interactions by applying various Mat Lab toolboxes (R2022A, ver..8. with Simulink).28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39 Figure 1D, depicts largely checked sensors (microelectrode’s) bundled in a satisfying point that has been advocated to give complete beat and ideal motor perfection to Parkinson`s through the stimulations.40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 There one single microelectrode hap markers designate at the edge of sub thalamic nucleus (Figure 1,P1L), thus we employed “volume-of tissue-activated” (VTA) investigation via stimulus-parameters like intensity amplitude, pulse-width, and frequency as employed for the acquisition of data through this sensor (i.e., microelectrode). 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60

Figure 1

Experimental protocol.(A) Duration of single-test of achieving errand executed over the tangible display-screen using the markercil. In every-test, Parkinson is directed to spot at flinch (jolt) switch to start the test and to access to the red objective whilst the drive-cue is flashed plus return to jolt knob whilst the object flees, as faster as likely. (B) Duration for entire investigational (experiment) phase implies 8 deal with neutral (reasonable) wedges in 4 distinct stimulus settings, and 2wedges in every constraint. Every wedge consists of fifteen tests of range-reappearance activities after 20sec of digit-patter actions. (C) Representation of ACL-DBS device with bi-polar size-of STN-DBS LFPs, simultaneous estimate of β-power plus single electrode (unipolar, i.e., mono polar) stimuli supplied to one of the central-contacts, whilst Parkinson is easily sit in the chair, accomplish the given tasks. (D) 3dimensional restoration in left, middle plus right interpretations for all the analyzed microelectrodes. 28, 29 The sensors on left-hemi sphere were reflected to the right hemi sphere. Findings showed that all the verified sensors are grouped in a thoughtful bit which recommended to offer total ideal motoric enhancement for Parkinson’s through the deep brain stimulators (depicted in greenish color. 30

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/bbf01969-3293-43a7-8db5-2f25c8d56109image1.png

Which conforms those stimulations given to the microelectrodes which led to the V T A that coincided the nucleus-STN and the thoughtful bit for inclusive motoric-progression. Institute ethical approval obtained, and Helsinki principle followed, plus every subject is given written permission. The mean age at the onset was 62.15±1.58years (mean±SEM), duration-of-disease is 10±1.21 years, response to the medicine (mean-scoring of MDS-UPDRS stage-III 37.04±2.95 (MED-OFF), 12.42±1.67 (MED-ON), correspondingly. The medicine was off during the experiment. Fill

Investigational procedure

The procedure involved two stages, an indication (cued) ‘reaching-task’ through a marker (automated), and a 20second finger-tapping. Each test (Figure 1A) of the ‘reaching-task’ pioneered through the demonstration of a grey-filled-sphere (at posterior of computer-system-monitor) signaling that the subject must carry the marker to initial point when que is set. When, the instant, the biomarker is in the initial point, the orbit turns emerald-green to show that the biomarker is uncovered. Following the irregular and mutable interval of (i.e., pause) of 1 to 2seconds, a saffron-bursting orbit, which is termed “go-cue” occurred, over the 3prospective aimed locations, namely, “top - left”, “top – middle” and/or “top – right” of the computer display screen, i.e., monitor. After this “go-cue-signal”, the subject is directed to accomplish the aimed-object, i.e., target-object, return to starting point as swiftly as feasible. The Figure 1B, demonstrates the entire experiment comprising the 8-blocksof 15-testsby the entomb (or intomb) test intervals of 4s to 5seconds randomised. and 2-blocks are there in every 4-tested trials stimulus states (DBS-OFF: COL-DBS, ACL-DBS-200, ACL-DBS-400). 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61- Therefore, after

Table 1

Case-event

Micro electrodes

Investigation DBS

ONDBS

Stimulus contact (L/R)

StimAmp (L/R, mA)

Bipolarfeedback channel(L/R)

Online-filter range (L/R Hz)

Stimulus Contact (L/R)

StimAmp (L/R)

1

Medtronic1

L-3a

3

L-24

19–25

L-2

3.3 V

2

Medtronic1

L-3 /R-2c

3.5/1.5

L-24/R-13

14–20/15–21

L-1/R-2

2.9/2.7mA

3

Boston1

L2c/R3c

3/2

L-13/R-24

15–21/14–20

-L2-L-3/R-2-R3

4.0/3.5mA

4

Boston2

L-3c

1

L-24

16–22

L-2-L3

4.2mA

5

Abbot

R-3a,

1.5

R-24

17–23

R-2

3.2mA

6

Medtronic2

R-2a

1.5

R-13

19–25

R-1

2.6mA

7

Boston3

L-2c/R-2c

2.5/2.5

L-13/R-13

16–22/22–28

L-2-L4/R2

2.8/2.3mA

8

Medtronic2

R-2c

3

R-13

15–21

R-2

3.6mA

9

Medtronic2

L-3a

1.5

L-24

14–20

-L4

2.5mA

10

Medtronic2

L-2c/R-2c

1/3

L-13/R-13

22–28/22–28

L-2/R2

2.4/3.5mA

11

Medtronic2

L-3a/R-2c

3.5/3.5

L-24/R-13

18–24/17–23

L-2/R2

1.9/1.7mA

12

Medtroni2

L-2c/R-2c

3/3

L-13/R-13

12–18/21–27

L-2/R2

1.0/1.0mA

13

Boston1

L-2c/R-2c

2/2

L-13/R-13

18–24/20–26

L-2-L3/R-2-R3

4.5/1.7mA

Mean-average

2.38

17.3–23.3

2.77

SEM

0.18

0.66

0.22

Achieving the task of movement, and at the end of each block, the subject was directed to do finger-tapping activities for few seconds, i.e., 20s by utilizing their index-fingers on their browse through, flip-through as wide and fast as possible. Following the changes at every situation, the average-mean interval-of 67.67±9.20 seconds (mean±SEM) comprised prior to beginning the fresh-block for cleaning out the likely stimulus-effect as of previous block. In-full, signal acquisitions through every subject endured till3hours for left and right hemispheres/or 120 minuts for unilateral (hemisphere). Order-of experiment investigational-blocks are pseudo-randomized plus counter-balanced across subjects. For attaining this, and for every subject, the any 4 blocks encompassed the 4 stimulus constraints in the order of randomization, plus/ as well as 4 constraints are recurrent within the inverse direction within the dualistic 4 blocks (Figure 1B). 61, 62, 63, 64, 65

Electrical-stimulations

The electrical-stimulations were given one side of the brain, i.e., unilateral, i.e., to the brins hemi sphere contra lateral to hands-fingers accomplishing the work. A substantially and technically specifications configurable custom-built neuro stimulator and certified was employed to deliver continuous current stimulations within the monopolarmode. One-of two connections in center was applied as a stimulus connection, as well as the microelectrode spot assigned/screwed to the back-of subject was employed for reference-point-of view (Figure 1C).

Deciding and choosing stimulus-contacts, stimulus-intensity (voltage)/amplitude, β-band freq. for response

The β-band frequencies are used as feed-back-signals. Particularly, we delivered constant DBS to the centrally contacting and in the beginning at 0.5mA. Then we gradually enhanced stimulus-amplitudes in 0.5mA and 2-5voltage, pulse-width-60Hz, additions, till medical use was perceived with no dyskinesias for instance, paresthesia, and/or till 3.5mA was accomplished as the greatest amplitude-energy. If there is no visible medical result was examined, we echoed this process for next central-contact stage. By the time stimulus-contact and amplitude/stimulus-intensity were chosen, a period-of 2 minutes of stand gatherings (signal acquisitions through the MER) was accomplished. Local field potentials and beta oscillatory fluctuations are gathered/acquired (recorded with MER) as of 2connections adjacent the chosen stimulus contact within differential bipolar mode. 66, 67, 68, 69

The stimulus parameters demonstrated in the Table1 were kept chronic for various stimulus constraints for all hemi spheres.

Clinico-statisical inferences

A clinic-statistical techniques for the analysis purposes were organized through the custom written scripts within the MatLabR2021-b.

For those system of measurements measured and determined over the per-constraint-basis which includes stimulus swapping-rate, mean-average % of-time during the DBS was ON, average-burst-duration as well as ‘burst-rate’, matching student t-tests were conducted to assess the outcome of the stimulus-constraint. Bell-shaped-normal distribution guess was established by applying the “Anderson–Darling” testing’s. Numerous assessments for the differences were employed to numerous measurements were adjusted by applying the Bonferroni adjustment. For Every contrast the number-of-case-events, the student t-values as well as pre-modified. The P-values were reported<0.05 statistically significant.

Results

Results showed that reducing the smoothing window for quantifying β did lead to shortened β-burst durations by increasing the number of β bursts shorter than 200ms and more frequent switching “ON/OFF” of the stimulator but had no behavioral effects. Both ACL-DBS and COL-DBS improved motor performance to an equivalent extent compared to no “ON-DBS”. Secondary analysis revealed that there were indemarkerdent effects of a decrease in β power and an increase in gamma power in predicting faster movement speed, while a decrease in β event-related-de synchronization (ERD) predicted quicker movement initiation. COL-DBS blocked both β and gamma (γ) more than ACL-DBS, whereas β ERD was reduced to a similar level during COL-DBS and ACL-DBS compared with no DBS, which together explained the achieved similar performance improvement in reaching movements during COL-DBS and ACL-DBS. In addition, ACL-DBS significantly improved tremor compared with no DBS but was not as effective as COL-DBS. These results suggest that STN β- triggered ACL-DBS is effective in improving motor performance during reaching movements in people with Parkinson’s disease, and that shortening of the smoothing window does not result in any additional behavioral benefit. When developing ACL-DBS systems for Parkinson’s disease, it might not be necessary to track very fast β dynamics; combining β, gamma, and information from motor decoding might be more beneficial with additional bio- markers needed for optimal treatment of tremor. This research is not just fundamentally designed to expand knowledge of basic mechanisms and principles of health and care problems. This is generally longer-term research with broad applicability and involves strategic, applied, developmental and implementation.

Conclusions

This study estimated the efficacy of the sub thalamic nucleus beta β-activated advanced adaptive closed loop deep brain stimulators (ACL-DBS) throughout the achieving mission concerning u p p e r-limb m o v e m e n t s within the 13subjects with advanced idiopathic Parkinson disease shaking palsy. We demonstrated that β-activated ACL-DBS devices were did not compromised the motoric execution of reaching (with the help of cue,i.e. cued) movements in rapports of response time as well as movement speed equated through the conventional open loop(COL-DBS) device. The two devices are substantially enhanced motoric-execution through the analogous amounts judged with no stimulations. Furthermore, we explained that by applying the quicker window-smoothing technique to assess the beta (β) oscillations did make ACL-DBS further approachable and reactive. It reduced β-bursts interval-periods by improving the numerous β-bursts concise than 200milliseconds, yet this didn`t give one further advantage within the motor execution. Also we demonstrated that the two STN and β-reductions as well as gamma-energy-power strengthen throughout drive assisted in expecting the drive pace and speediness’, signifying that compounding theβeta, γgamma as well as drive position may consult additional advantage in advanced adapative ACL-DBS devices. Additionally, β-activated ACL-DBS device was not that much as applicable as that of the COL-DBS device in defeating the Parkinsonian restingtrem or, advocating that supplementary responsive-feedback-signals can be obliged for shaking palsy and for dominant dominant tremors of the individuals-patients, i.e., Parkinson disease patients. The results in this study have noteworthy effects for extended enhancement of the ACL-DBS devices algorithmic-techniques to enhance the cure and to comprehend better Parkinson`s disease.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

G Deuschl C Schade-Brittinger P Krack J Volkmann H Schäfer K Bötzel A randomized trial of deep-brain stimulation for Parkinson’s diseaseN Engl J Med20063559896908

2 

R Zangaglia C Pacchetti C Pasotti F Mancini D Servello E Sinforiani Deep brain stimulation and cognitive functions in Parkinson’s disease: a three-year controlled studyMov Disord2009241116218

3 

A Castrioto AM Lozano YY Poon AE Lang M Fallis E Moro Ten-year outcome of subthalamic stimulation in Parkinson disease: a blinded evaluationArch Neurol2011681215506

4 

AA Kühn A Kupsch GH Schneider P Brown Reduction in subthalamic 8-35 Hz oscillatory activity correlates with clinical improvement in Parkinson's diseaseEur J Neurosci2006237195660

5 

AA Kühn A Tsui T Aziz N Ray C Brücke A Kupsch Pathological synchronisation in the subthalamic nucleus of patients with Parkinson’s disease relates to both bradykinesia and rigidityExp Neurol200921523807

6 

WJ Neumann K Degen K Degen C Brücke J Huebl P Brown Subthalamic syn- chronized oscillatory activity correlates with motor impair- ment in patients with Parkinson’s diseaseMov Disord20163111174851

7 

A Oswal M Beudel L Zrinzo P Limousin M Hariz T Foltynie Deep brain stimulation mod- ulates synchrony within spatially and spectrally distinct resting state networks in Parkinson’s diseaseBrain2016139Pt 5148296

8 

S Little P Brown Debugging adaptive deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s diseaseMov Disord202035455561

9 

YM Kehnemouyi KB Wilkins CM Anidi RW Anderson MF Afzal HM Bronte-Stewart Modulation of β bursts in subthala- mic sensorimotor circuits predicts improvement in bradykine- siaBrain2021144247386

10 

G Tinkhauser A Pogosyan S Little M Beudel DM Herz H Tan The modulatory effect of adaptive deep brain stimulation on β bursts in Parkinson’s diseaseBrain20171404105367

11 

G Tinkhauser A Pogosyan H Tan DM Herz AA Kühn P Brown B-Burst dynamics in Parkinson’s disease OFF and ON dopa- minergic medicationBrain201714011296881

12 

G Tinkhauser The cumulative effect of transient synchrony states on motor performance in Parkinson’s diseaseJ Neurosci20204015711580

13 

F Torrecillos Modulation of β bursts in the subthalamic nucleus predicts motor performanceJ Neurosci20183889058917

14 

S Little Adaptive deep brain stimulation in advanced Parkinson diseaseAnn Neurol201374449457

15 

S Little M Beudel L Zrinzo T Foltynie P Limousin M Hariz Bilateral adaptive deep brain stimulation is effective in Parkinson’s diseaseJ Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry201687771721

16 

DM Herz S Little DJ Pedrosa G Tinkhauser B Cheeran T Foltynie Mechanisms Underlying Decision-Making as Revealed by Deep-Brain Stimulation in Patients with Parkinson's DiseaseCurr Biol2018288116978

17 

I Iturrate S Martin R Chavarriaga B Orset R Leeb A Sobolewski Beta-driven closed-loop deep brain stimulation can compromise human motor behavior in Parkinson’s DiseasebioRxiv201910.1101/696385

18 

D Piña-Fuentes JMC van Dijk JC van Zijl HR Moes T Laar DLM Oterdoom Acute effects of adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's diseaseBrain Stimul2020136150716

19 

M Arlotti Eight-hours adaptive deep brain stimulation in patients with Parkinson diseaseNeurology201890971976

20 

T Bocci M Prenassi M Arlotti FM Cogiamanian L Borellini E Moro Eight-hours conventional versus adaptive deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson’s diseaseNPJ Parkinsons Dis202178810.1038/s41531-021-00229-z

21 

RE Gilron S Little R Perrone R Wilt C Hemptinne MS Yaroshinsky Long-term wireless streaming of neural recordings for circuit discovery and adaptive stimula- tion in individuals with Parkinson’s diseaseNat Biotechnol2021399107885

22 

AA Kühn D Williams A Kupsch P Limousin M Hariz GH Schneider Event-related β desyn- chronization in human subthalamic nucleus correlates with motor performanceBrain2004127Pt 473546

23 

N Jenkinson P Brown New insights into the relationship be- tween dopamine, β oscillations and motor functionTrends Neurosci201134126118

24 

A Oswal V Litvak C Brücke J Huebl GH Schneider AA Kühn Cognitive factors modulate ac- tivity within the human subthalamic nucleus during voluntary movement in Parkinson’s diseaseJ Neurosci201333401581526

25 

O Darbin N Hatanaka S Takara Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation driven by primary motor cortex γ2 activity in parkinsonian monkeysSci Rep202212649310.1038/s41598-022-10130-1

26 

J Feingold DJ Gibson B DePasquale AM Graybiel Bursts of β oscillation differentiate postperformance activity in the stri- atum and motor cortex of monkeys performing movement tasksProc Natl Acad Sci USA2015112441368792

27 

MA Sherman S Lee R Law S Haegens CA Thorn MS Hämäläinen Neural mechanisms of transi- ent neocortical β rhythms: converging evidence from hu- mans, computational modeling, monkeys, and miceProc Natl Acad Sci USA201611333488594

28 

BB Avants CL Epstein M Grossman JC Gee Symmetric diffeomorphic image registration with cross-correlation: evaluating automated labeling of elderly and neurodegenerative brainMed Image Anal20081212641

29 

A Horn N Li TA Dembek A Kappel C Boulay S Ewert Lead-DBS v2: towards a compre- hensive pipeline for deep brain stimulation imagingNeuroimage201918429331610.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.08.068

30 

T A Dembek Probabilistic sweet spots predict motor outcome for deep brain stimulation in Parkinson diseaseAnn Neurol201986527538

31 

J Ansó M Benjaber B Parks S Parker CR Oehrn M Petrucci Concurrent stimulation and sensing in bi-directional brain interfaces: a multi-site translational experienceJ Neural Eng202219210.1088/1741-2552/ac59a3

32 

AC Meidahl Adaptive deep brain stimulation for movement disor- ders: the long road to clinical therapyMov Disord20173268109

33 

J Stamatakis J Ambroise J Crémers H Sharei V Delvaux B Macq Finger tapping clini- metric score prediction in Parkinson’s disease using low-cost accelerometersComput Intell Neurosci201371785310.1155/2013/717853

34 

JC Van Dennoort R Verhagen KJ van Dijk PH Veltink MCPM Vos RMA de Bie Quantification of hand motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease: a proof-of-principle study using inertial and force sensorsAnn Biomed Eng20174510242336

35 

S He A Mostofi E Syed F Torrecillos G Tinkhauser P Fischer Subthalamic β-targeted neuro- feedback speeds up movement initiation but increases tremor in parkinsonian patientsElife20209e6097910.7554/eLife.60979

36 

S Lo S Andrews To transform or not to transform: using gener- alized linear mixed models to analyse reaction time dataFront Psychol20156117110.3389/fpsyg.2015.01171

37 

E Maris R Oostenveld Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-dataJ Neurosci Methods2007164117790

38 

C Wiest G Tinkhauser A Pogosyan M Bange M Muthuraman S Groppa Local field potential activity dynamics in response to deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson’s diseaseNeurobiol Dis202014310501910.1016/j.nbd.2020.105019

39 

R Lofredi L Okudzhava F Irmen C Brücke J Huebl JK Krauss Subthalamic β bursts correlate with dopamine-demarkerdent motor symptoms in 106 Parkinson’s patientsNPJ Parkinsons Dis202391210.1038/s41531-022-00443-3

40 

M Deffains L Iskhakova S Katabi Z Israel H Bergman Longer β oscillatory episodes reliably identify pathological subthalamic activity in parkinsonismMov Disord20183310160918

41 

I Echeverria-Altuna AJ Quinn N Zokaei MW Woolrich AC Nobre F Ede Transient beta activity and cortico-muscular connectivity during sustained motor behaviourProg Neurobiol202221410228110.1016/j.pneurobio.2022.102281

42 

G Pfurtscheller A Stancák C Neuper Post-movement β synchronization. a correlate of an idling motor area?Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol199698428193

43 

R Chen Z Yaseen LG Cohen M Hallett Time course of corti- cospinal excitability in reaction time and self-paced move- mentsAnn Neurol199844331725

44 

JR Wessel A Ghahremani K Udupa U Saha SK Kalia M Hodaie Stop-related subthalamic beta activity indexes global motor suppression in Parkinson's diseaseMov Disord20163112184653

45 

NJ Ray JS Brittain P Holland RA Joundi JF Stein TZ Aziz The role of the subthalamic nucleus in response inhibition: evidence from local field poten- tial recordings in the human subthalamic nucleusNeuroimage20126012718

46 

H Tan A Pogosyan A Anzak K Ashkan M Bogdanovic AL Green Complementary roles of different oscillatory activities in the subthalamic nucleus in coding motor effort in parkinsonismExp Neuro20132481879510.1016/j.expneurol.2013.06.010

47 

A Anzak H Tan A Pogosyan T Foltynie P Limousin L Zrinzo Subthalamic nucleus activity optimizes maximal effort motor responses in Parkinson’s dis- easeBrain2012135Pt 9276678

48 

R Lofredi WJ Neumann A Bock A Horn J Huebl S Siegert Dopamine-demarkerdent scaling of subthalamic gamma bursts with movement velocity in patients with Parkinson’s diseaseElife201873189510.7554/eLife.31895

49 

C Brücke J Huebl T Schönecker WJ Neumann K Yarrow A Kupsch Scaling of movement is related to pallidal γ oscillations in patients with dystoniaJ Neurosci2012323100819

50 

AA Kühn F Kempf C Brücke LG Doyle IM Torres A Pogosyan High-frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus suppresses oscillatory beta activity in patients with Parkinson's disease in parallel with improvement in motor performanceJ Neurosci20082824616573

51 

A Eusebio W Thevathasan D Gaynor A Pogosyane E By T Foltynie Deep brain stimu- lation can suppress pathological synchronisation in parkinson- ian patientsJ Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry201182556973

52 

S Little P Brown What brain signals are suitable for feedback control of deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease?Ann N Y Acad Sci201212651924

53 

A Velisar J Syrkin-Nikolau Z Blumenfeld MH Trager MF Afzal V Prabhakar Dual threshold neural closed loop deep brain stimulation in Parkinson disease patientsBrain Stimul201912486876

54 

SE Qasim C Hemptinne NC Swann S Miocinovic JL Ostrem PA Starr Electrocorticography reveals β desynchronization in the basal ganglia-cortical loop during rest tremor in Parkinson’s diseaseNeurobiol Dis2016861778610.1016/j.nbd.2015.11.023

55 

SY Wang TZ Aziz JF Stein X Liu Time-frequency analysis of transient neuromuscular events: dynamic changes in activity of the subthalamic nucleus and forearm muscles related to the intermittent resting tremorJ Neurosci Methods20051451-21518

56 

J Hirschmann CJ Hartmann M Butz N Hoogenboom TE Ozkurt S Elben A direct relationship between oscillatory subthalamic nucleus-cortex coupling and rest tremor in Parkinson’s diseaseBrain2013136Pt 12365970

57 

J Debarros L Gaignon S He A Pogosyan M Benjaber T Denison Artefact-free recording of local field potentials with simultaneous stimulation for closed-loop deep-brain stimulationAnnu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc2020336770 10.1109/EMBC44109.2020.9176665

58 

S He F Baig A Mostofi A Pogosyan J Debarros AL Green Closed-loop deep brain stimulation for essential tremor based on thalamic local field potentialsMov Disord202136486373

59 

H Tan J Debarros S He A Pogosyan TZ Aziz Y Huang Decoding voluntary movements and postural tremor based on thalamic LFPs as a basis for closed-loop stimulation for essential tremorBrain Stimul201912485867

60 

E Opri Chronic embedded cortico-thalamic closed-loop deep brain stimulation for the treatment of essential tremorSci Transl Med202012572768010.1126/scitranslmed.aay7680

61 

T Merk V Peterson WJ Lipski B Blankertz RS Turner N Li Electrocorticography is su- perior to subthalamic local field potentials for movement de- coding in Parkinson’s diseaseElife202211e7512610.7554/eLife.75126

62 

NC Swann C Hemptinne S Miocinovic S Qasim SS Wang N Ziman Gamma oscilla- tions in the hyperkinetic state detected with chronic human brain recordings in Parkinson’s diseaseJ Neurosci20163624644558

63 

RE Gilron S Little R Wilt R Perrone J Anso PA Starr Sleep-aware adaptive deep brain stimulation control: chronic use at home with dual indemarkerdent linear discriminate detec- torsFront Neurosci20211573249910.3389/fnins.2021.732499

64 

OE Vaou MD Spidi R Raike A Moises S Stanslaski M Case Symptom optimization through sensing local field potentials: balancing β and gam- ma in Parkinson’s diseaseDeep Brain Stimulation2023151410.1016/j.jdbs.2023.01.001

65 

Z Blumenfeld MM Koop TE Prieto LA Shreve A Velisar EJ Quinn Sixty-hertz stimulation improves bradykinesia and amplifies subthalamic low- frequency oscillationsMov Disord2017321808

66 

C Moreau O Pennel-Ployart S Pinto A Plachez A Annic F Viallet Modulation of dysar- thropneumophonia by low-frequency STN DBS in advanced Parkinson’s diseaseMov Disord201126465963

67 

T Xie J Vigil E MacCracken A Gasparaitis J Young W Kang Low-frequency stimulation of STN-DBS reduces aspiration and freezing of gait in patients with PDNeurology201584441520

68 

T Xie M Padmanaban B Bertacchi W Kang E MacCracken A Dachman Long-term effect of low fre- quency stimulation of STN on dysphagia, freezing of gait and other motor symptoms in PDJ Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry201889998994

69 

C Wiest F Torrecillos G Tinkhauser A Pogosyan F Morgante EA Pereira Finely-tuned gamma oscillations: spectral characteristics and links to dyskinesiaExp Neurol202235111399910.1016/j.expneurol.2022.113999



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 10-04-2024

Accepted : 21-06-2024


View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijn.2024.019


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 386

PDF Downloaded: 130



Medical Abbreviation List